WHAT'S NEW

About
My Other Blog
Blog Schedule
Activism
Past Blog Posts
Various &
a Sundry Blogs Update 07/03/2026
Favorite
Websites--updated 07/03/2026'
My Stuff
On The Web, Updated 06/28/2026
Audio-Visual Updated: 07/30/2026
Favorite
Articles --
last updated 07/30/2026
This Month's Scripture Verse:

1 But false prophets also appeared among the people, just as there will also be false teachers among you, who will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing swift destruction upon themselves. 2 Many will follow their indecent behavior, and because of them the way of the truth will be maligned; 3 and in their greed they will exploit you with false words; their judgment from long ago is not idle, and their destruction is not asleep..
II Peter 2:1-3

SEARCH THIS BLOG

Showing posts with label Republican Party. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Republican Party. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 10, 2024

Tis The Year For Two Christmases

Every four years, we have Christmas twice a year. In fact, every four years we have Christmas on consecutive months. For each of those Christmases, we are presented with a portrayal of mythical characters who are said to bring us great joy by the gifts they will give us. These mythical characters appeal to children regardless of their actual ages. And for those Christmases, the heightened expectations for the coming of each of those mythical characters lasts for around a few months at the most as the gifts they promise rarely meet our expectations.

When we think about how those running for office appeal to us, Election Day becomes another Christmas because the candidates talk to us as if we're children. They seem to believe that all they have to do is to promise us the stars while painting their opponents as  a real life Grinch using language that an elementary school student could understand. And the reason why they do that is because it works--and that is on each one of us. Even if there are individuals who dislike such appeals, it works to varying degrees on most of us. 

In addition, because we Americans have, for the most part, refused to show that we are the home of the brave by refusing to vote for third party candidates, we end up with a choice between voting for the them candidate or the not them candidate where the best qualification of each candidate is that they are not like their opponent. And since the candidates from each major political party only have to show that they are not like the other candidate, the standards met by our 2 major Presidential nominees have been consistently dropping with each election.

And so we are constantly bombarded by political ads that show the candidates from the 2 major political parties speaking before adoring crowds. These crowds are so amorous one would think that these candidates are real life, messianic figures. But in reality, the candidates from both major political parties are merely playing the role of Santa Clause. And because we don't want to pay any more attention to the politics of our democracy than we absolutely have to, that suits us fine. 

Of course there are additional reasons why we get the political candidates that we get. It is because our politicians reflect us, the people whom they seek to serve, exploit, and/or rule over. George Carlin said as much when he said that selfish, ignorant voters elect selfish, ignorant public officials. And so if we want better candidates, we, as a society, need to curb our selfishness and work at becoming more educated and informed. Or as Martin Luther King Jr said, that we need to change from caring more about gadgets, profit motives, and property rights to carrying more about people. But good luck with that in a Consumer Society where, as King warned us against, we look to gain too much personal significance from our salaries and material goods than by how much we have helped those in need and have, in positive ways, influenced society.

One other note should be sounded here. While the Democrats campaign as being vanguards for those in the Middle Class rather than empowering workers and those in the lower economic classes, the Trumpublicans campaign on narrow self-interests and celebrating the lack of self-restraint. Our choice continues to be how I have described it before in at least one other time, that the working, not necessarily campaign, agendas of both political parties are putting us on a track to self-destruction. The difference between the two major political parties is that the Dems are acting like a local train while the Repubs are acting like an express train. And so the real difference between the two major political parties is which one will cause us to self-destruct sooner than the other.



Tuesday, August 22, 2023

These Are Not Your Father's Political Parties

Oldsmobile use to have a commercial slogan that emphasized the changes made over time in their cars. The slogan: 'Not Your Father's Oldsmobile.' 

That slogan could be readapted to fit both of our major political parties because both parties have undergone significant changes over the past 160 years.

For example, the Democratic Party, as some conservatives are fond of pointing out, use to be the political party of slavery and then segregation. But, as those same conservatives are fond of overlooking, today's Democrats are far stronger promoters of equality than today's Republicans. In fact, the change started to occur around 1964 and 1965 with the passing of the Civil and Voting Rights Acts. In fact, out of the 42 Republican House of Representative congressmen who either voted against, voted present, or did not vote at all during the passage of the the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 29 were from states that could not be associated with the Confederacy. Out of the 100 Democrats who did not vote to pass the Civil Rights Act, only 7 were from non Confederate states. And, in fact, the 1964 Republican Presidential candidate, Barry Goldwater, voted against the Civil Rights Act in the Senate. Thus a Congressperson's region, rather than political party, served as the best predictor for those who voted on the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

Both of our major political parties have changed significantly in my lifetime--I still remember the Kennedy-Nixon Presidential campaign. That was burnt into my memory because the mom, along with her twin sister, were very strong and loyal GOP supporters.

But we don't have to go that far back to see how both of our major political parties have changed. And over the past 20 to 30 years, while the Democrats became more business friendly under President Clinton, the Republicans have changed the most especially since the 2016 election. The Republican Party that existed when Mitt Romney ran as the Republican nominee for President is all but extinct now that Trump has become the leader of the party. And nothing could point out the dramatic changes in the Republican over the years than to compare how the Republicans reacted to the legal problems of Richard Nixon with how the are reacting now to the legal problems of Donald Trump.

For example, the most remembered question that occurred during the Senate Watergate hearings came from a Republican, Howard Baker, from Tennessee. His question: 'What did the president know and when did he know it?' During Watergate, there was a true bipartisan effort to get at the truth. Political tribalism did not rear its ugly, partisan head during those hearings. And because of that, there was good evidence that our government was functional, if not working, despite the failures of President Nixon.

It cannot be said that the same objectivity and lack of partisanship exists today. And that could be said both of those elected Republican officials in the House of Representatives nor of the voters who put them in office. And this is despite the fact that the crimes of President Nixon were much more obscured and took significantly more effort to find and reveal than the crimes of Trump. 

And so what has a been the response of the majority of Republicans elected to the House of Representatives to the criminal indictments of former President Trump by grand juries, not elected officials or political or judicial appointees? It has been to gaslight the public. Those Republicans who are remaining loyal to Trump are claiming that Trump is a vicim of political persecution and are also claiming that President Biden is the real guilty culprit  in this saga. And that is despite the fact that thus far, the Republicans have failed to produce any court worthy evidence that implicated Biden in any crimes while Trump has been indicted by a few grand juries.

So what we have in the House of Representatives, we are not speaking here to the situation in the Senate, is a highly contentious and partisan set of Republicans who are looking more to win elections and conquer their political rivals than to search for the truth over the allegations made about President Trump. And who do we have to blame for this mess? We need to look no farther than our closest non-magic mirror for the answer. At least that is what George Carlin has stated in some of his comedy routines. That because those officials were raised in American homes, received American educations, and were voted in by real Americans; it is the public's fault for this political dilemma.

And one of the driving factors in why the American voting public has voted in these Republicans in the House of Representatives is the widespread embracing of conspiracy theories that shed a negative light on the Dems or a positive light on the Repubs. And here, we should note that one of the factors that significantly contributes to the acceptance of conspiracy theories is the desire to show that one's own group, the Republican Party in this case, is superior to all of the other political parties (click here for the reference). Of course there are other factors involved such as the anxiety level of people and how confusing the times are. But I do want to focus  on how the desire to show that one's own group is superior to others makes us more vulnerable to accepting conspiracy theories. 

This desire to show that one's own group is superior to others shows that many of us are struggling to have or maintain an adequate personal sense of significance in today's world. In other words, one of  the real battles in encountering a person who has eagerly believed in conspiracy theories is in a person's battle for feeling significant. And so challenging  a person about a given conspiracy theory with the facts can be counterproductive. That is because we are using facts to tell a person who has serious doubts about themselves that not only are they wrong, but they have been fooled.

And so the Republican Party is messed up because many of its constituents are battling their own personal issues of feeling insignificant. And many of the leaders and influencers for the current Republican Party are not only well aware of that weakness, they are exploiting it. Also, we need to remember that the Democratic Party is not so hot either because it has its own sins. And all that points to is how we the public are vulnerable to being manipulated and thus exploited by those who perhaps understand things about us that we are unwilling to admit to ourselves.



Tuesday, December 8, 2020

Necessary Splits

 Should things hold as they are now, then the following separations are necessary.

First, should Trump retain control of the Republican Party after Biden is inaugurated, then regular Republicans must leave the party.  They must leave the Republican Party in the hands of the Trumpublicans and form their own party.

Why must they leave? It is for the sake of integrity. Under Trump and the Trumpublicans, reality has been under constant assault. And what the Trumpublicans consider to be real today depends on what serves the needs of the President. This assault on reality started early during Trump Administration with the resorting to 'alternative facts' by a Trump spokesperson. It has continued throughout his Administration down to what is true about the Covid-19 virus and the election. 

The attack on reality has been aided by cults. By cult, I am referring to any pro-Trump group that has its members believing that the only news sources they can go to are those that support Trump. Certainly Trump has his own cult. But there seems to be a multitude of Trump supporting religiously conservative Christian groups that operate as cults as well. As a result, we have a number of Trumpublicans, both rank-and-file members as well as office holders, who cannot accept any reality that does not favor Trump in some way shape or form. Such people easily and passionately latch onto conspiracy theories and false individual claims about a number of subjects especially the election.

Should Trump retain control over the Republican Party after Biden becomes President, Republicans with integrity must leave their party and form their own political party so that their conservatism can be heard by the public and be represented in government with integrity. I say that not as a fan of political conservatism, but as someone who wants people who hold to political conservatism to be well represented in government.

On the flip side, Biden's nomination to be the Democratic Party's Presidential candidate should tell the progressives of that Party that the Democratic Party establishment is far more interested in the votes provided by progressives than their ideas.

Like the Republican Party, the Democratic Party is controlled by the wealth of business interests, especially those of Wall Street. That reality should have become clear by now since Clinton was President with his repeal of Glass-Steagall and promotion of NAFTA. That should have been clear by now by Obama's refusal to criminally prosecute the Wall Street execs whose fraud significantly contributed to the economic collapse of 2008 and his attempt to fast track the TPP. And that should have been clear by the Democratic Party's treatment of Bernie Sanders's attempts to earn the Party's Presidential nominee.

Progressives in the Democratic Party cannot hope to fight the influence that money has over the Democratic Party. While progressives could easily protest and oppose Trump's appointments of corporate lobbyists and executives to important government positions, they should also be significantly riled by Biden's corporate appointments. After all, wasn't it credibly reported that Biden told Wall Street supporters that 'nothing would change' should he be elected?

Certainly there will be some cosmetic changes in policies with the Biden Presidency. And we will be relieved from Trump's attempts at strongman rule over the nation once Biden is inaugurated. But what won't change is the general direction of the nation under a Biden Presidency. That general direction's destination is that of furthering corporate rule over the nation. With a Biden Presidency, that general direction will undergo a major facelift. The new facade will be more appealing, more attractive to look at. But the direction will not be any different than that of direction pursued by President Trump.

Again, should Trump retain control of the Republican Party, we need splits in both parties. We need exoduses of those who are more purist in their ideologies from our two major political parties. Without those separations from the two major parties, we will can only be assured of worse and worse major party candidates for President.





Tuesday, September 18, 2018

Another Malware Trait Of Our Democracy

Though America prides itself on being a democracy, it shouldn't. Its democracy is weak if it exists at all. And it is plagued with at least 3 malware operating traits that we seem too arrogantly stubborn to even acknowledge let alone address.

The first malware trait of our democracy is that we employ a lazy democracy. Democracy for us is voting every x number of years for officials whom we hope to be able to ignore until the next election. If what these officials do does not negatively interfere with our pursuit of happiness and wealth, we are content. If not, generally speaking, we store up our anger for the next election. 


The second malware trait of our democracy is that it is bipolar. That is we keep switching between the leadership of one of two political parties: the Republicans and the Democrats. This puts these two parties in a co-dependent, job security relationship where their failures ensure future work for the other party. The so-called independent voter is a bipolar voter, while those who vote for one party or the other find themselves choosing between political tribalism and voter resignation.

Now if those two malware traits were not bad enough, we have another one that sabotages democracy by ensuring that only an elite-centered rule emerges despite, or perhaps because of, our democratic processes. This third malware trait has more to do with the behavior of our 2 major political parties. To different degrees, our two major political parties act as proxies dressed up in vanguard clothing.

So what does it mean for a political party to act as a proxy? It means that its actions and what it advocates are directed by others. And here, in particular, those directing our political parties are not the voters, but are one or a few small interest groups. This consolidates political power so that our government employs elite-centered rule that revolves around the interests and welfare of a few "exceptional" people who call the shots (click here for America's democratic status).

Both of our major political parties serve financial elites before they serve us. One party serves these elites more than the other, but both are pretty much under the control of the financial elites in our nation--here, we should note that sometimes there is a conflict of interest between different sets of elites.

So we have both political parties whose main purpose is follow the directives of our nation's financial elites when writing and passing legislation. Why would we voters support such political parties with our votes? It is because disguise their allegiances by putting on their vanguard clothing over their proxy clothing. 


What is a vanguard? The Meriam-Webster Dictionary defines a vanguard as 'the forefront of an action or movement' (click here for the reference). The vanguard of a political group is a small group that sets the pace for the larger group while claiming to represent the larger group. And it also markets itself as a vicarious leader in that how one reacts to the vanguard is interpreted how one reacts to the larger group.

A perfect historical example of a vanguard was seen in Lenin and the Bolsheviks as they led, or hijacked, the Russian Revolution. Those who opposed them, even if they were fellow Socialists,  were then portrayed and treated as if they opposed the Revolution and its people. This mentality caused a great number of purges among the Socialists in Russia.

Now it's not like we see purges in our political parties here. But both the Republican and Democratic Parties have portrayed themselves as vanguards of different movements. The Republicans claim to be the vanguard for the anti-abortion segment of the Pro-life movement as well as for American traditionalists. The Democrats claim to be the vanguard for minorities and human rights. However, both parties act more as proxies for the financial elites than as vanguards though being a vanguard can sometimes take a little away from being proxy. That last point helps explain the difference in how much more the Republicans act as a proxy for our nation's financial elites than how the Democrats act.

The problem with relying on the vanguard, however, is that it still  utilizes an elite-centered rule political structure. Vanguards rely on a few to represent/rule over many. And any elite-centered rule political structure allows for minimal input and participation by the masses.

I suppose that when the masses are so interested in or, by necessity, forced to focus on, making a living, they are prohibited from being more politically involved. As a result, depending on vanguards makes a certain amount of sense. The problem is that such a setup carries all of the baggage that the elite-centered rule of allowing vanguards involves. And since being proxies are these political parties' alter-egos, being vanguards enables these parties to pretend to care for the masses while they cater to the needs and even whims of the few. Certainly we don't see the kind of control over dissent exercised by the example of a vanguard which was mentioned earlier. We don't see the purges within either political party that Lenin instituted among the Socialists of his day. But we see half-hearted, if that much, representations of the masses by those claiming to be vanguards while at the same time our participation and voices are greatly reduced.


The Trump Presidency has moved more and more people to call for change. But the change begins with us. The change means that we must become more politically active than just voting every x number of years. The change includes a rejection of our bipolar democracy by investing in and voting for 3rd party candidates. And the change also involves refusing to let our political parties act as vanguards for the groups we belong to. If we make these changes, then perhaps our political parties will not just shed the vanguard apparel, it will forsake its proxy roles and look to represent the general public rather than some elite sector of the population.






Friday, December 8, 2017

The Pro-Life Hypocrisy Of The GOP

Being pressed for time because of a busy schedule, it is useful to write this review on an article that is a must read and needs little to no further explanation. John Pavlovitz (click here for his short self description) on how the GOP is political party that is not really interested in being pro-life. Rather, that political party's concern for human life outside of the womb shows the duplicity of its claim to be pro-life.

If the GOP is not pro-life, then what is it? Pavlovitz describes it perfectly in the following sentence (click here for the article):

The unborn are easy to advocate for because you can idealize them into something palatable to you, something benign and comfortable, something in your own image.

Pavlovitz concisely and correctly points out the inconsistencies between the GOP's pro-life claims, which, btw, are based solely on its stand against abortion, with its lack of concern for the lives of others, especially those of non-whites. This selective approach of choosing which victims to defend is an age-old undertaking. It consists of helping only those one can canonize as being guiltless. Perhaps that is one reason why groups from the poor to immigrants to Black Lives Matter to Palestinians and others do not merit any sympathy from the GOP. For faults can be found in each of those groups. And for as long as the GOP can be associated with protecting little angels, they have a lock on the votes of many a ignorant religiously conservative  Christian voter. 

Because faults can be found in most other groups of victims, there remains not compelling reason to do what requires the most energy of any human task: to change. Thus, doing something to save the lives of those other than unborn children is not necessary for many a religiously conservative Christian. That is because changing might mean abandoning materialistic riches or admitting sins. So being able to find faults in victims excuses many of these Christians from changing.

I won't say anything else about the article. There are a couple of minor points he makes with which I could disagree. But Pavlovitz's article is one of the best articles I've read and I prefer people reading his article instead reading whatever insights I could offer.


 

Monday, August 7, 2017

ONIM For August 7, 2017

If you are not sure about the validity of a news story linked to below, you can use  mediabiasfactcheck.com to check out the credibility of the source of most of the stories linked to here.

Christian News

World News

Israel-Palestine News

Collusion News

Donald Trump News

Pick(s) Of The Litter

Monday, June 5, 2017

ONIM For June 5, 2017

If you are not sure about the validity of a news story linked to below, you can use  mediabiasfactcheck.com to check out the credibility of the source of most of the stories linked to here.


Christian News

World News

Protest News

Trump News

Pick(s) Of The Litter







     

Tuesday, August 2, 2016

A Very, Very Brief Summary Of This Year's Presidential Election

On the one hand, we have one major party presidential candidate singing the following to us:
Xenophobia here we come, right back where we started from.

On the other hand we have the other major party presidential candidate constantly saying the following to us:
Who's your momma? Who's your momma? Who's going to take care of you? Who's your momma

What we don't hear is the song they sing in unison:
There's no business like big business like no business we know.
However, there is a difference in how the major party political candidates sing that last song. While one candidate belts out that tune like Ethel Merman would, the other whispers it quietly while hiding in a closet lest they be discovered singing it.

What we miss here is that us voters will more often than not base our votes on the accessible fringe benefits that we believe a given candidate will bring to us through their modifications to our economic system as opposed to the real benefits that a inclusive democracy could bring. An inclusive democracy is one where the people press the demands of others, especially the most vulnerable, along with their own demands in an effort to share society as equals rather than as a ruling group.

Because we don't want an inclusive democracy and because we want our piece of the pie. Seeing futility in the system,  too many of us American voters have been singing:

Send in the clowns
And now that the Republican and Democratic Parties have granted our request, we are experiencing buyers remorse.

 




Monday, July 25, 2016

ONIM For July 25, 2016

Christian News

World News

Pick(s) Of The Litter