WHAT'S NEW

About
My Other Blog
Blog Schedule
NEW
Movie Links
Updated- 10/28/2026
Past Blog Posts
Various &
a Sundry Blogs Update 07/03/2026
Favorite
Websites--updated 07/03/2026'
My Stuff
On The Web, Updated 06/28/2026
Audio-Visual Updated: 10/28/2026
Favorite
Articles --
last updated 08/13/2026
This Month's Scripture Verse:

1 But false prophets also appeared among the people, just as there will also be false teachers among you, who will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing swift destruction upon themselves. 2 Many will follow their indecent behavior, and because of them the way of the truth will be maligned; 3 and in their greed they will exploit you with false words; their judgment from long ago is not idle, and their destruction is not asleep..
II Peter 2:1-3

SEARCH THIS BLOG

Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Views From The Outside For Novermber 3, 2026

 Views From The Outside

The purpose of this page is to list news stories and reports from mostly Western sources outside of the U.S. You can use Google Translate to translate articles that are printed in another language. 

So far, news sources include:

International

From Canada

From England

From France

From Germany

From Russian Source 

From Spain

From Switzerland

From Ukraine


<< Previous Views                                                        Next Views >>


Friday, October 30, 2026

Tis The Midterm Of Two Changes

America has been undergoing a king-of-the-hill battle between two changes. And it is neither the best of times nor the worst of times for either change: Change-1 and Change-2. However, under CEO Trump, Change-1 is on the road to the best of times while Change-2 is swiftly diving toward the worst of times.

Before describing Change-1 and Change-2, we need to discuss the above label for Trump. While the nation has experienced the 'No-Kings' protests, it seems that, overall, Trump is acting more like a CEO  than a wannabe King. He sees our nation as a business that seeks to maximize its profits and assets. And therefore most, if not all, of his policies, both foreign and domestic, are transactional for either the nation or himself. That makes him a value-less leader--which is something that my fellow believers in Christ should take note of. And so his attempts to silence wokeism, CRT, the Left, and so forth are done purely out of profit seeking motive. He knows that silencing the beliefs opposed by a religiously conservative Christian dominated, social conservative sector secures a strong political base for maintaining political power.

Now for Change-1. Change-1 is a reactionary response to Change-2 which partially includes and then goes beyond a return to any past time in America's history. Certainly Change-1 wants to combine a return to the glory days of the 1950s and before with, what Marx would call, a 'bourgeoisie dictatorship. That could be an oligarchy in today's terms. And when it comes to choosing between that dictatorship and Change-2, most of my fellow religiously conservative Christians support the former rather than the latter because we religiously conservative Christians have a strong penchant for authoritarianism.

On a societal level, Change-1 wants a social hierarchy that privileges religiously conservative Christianity above all other religions and ethnic groups. The goal of Change-1 is to base many, if not all, of our  laws on Christian beliefs. Of course, that is the polite way to describe it. In reality, Change-1 wants religiously conservative Christianity to be able to impose many of its personal moral values on the general public through legislation. That is the goal of Christian Hubris. It does so because many who support Change-1 believe that a non-Christian society poses a moral threat to the Church and especially to the chidren of "good" Christians. BTW, I use the term Christian Hubris as a label for both  Christian Nationalists and those religiously conservative Christians who, in principle, oppose the idea of Christian Nationalism while seeking to accomplish the same task of  imposing their religious values on society. 

We should note that Christian Hubris is not monolithic. It includes those who want theonomy,  those who advocate an updated version of Christendom, and those who simply want a Christian paternalism. The difference between those groups lies in the degree of control that Christianity would exercise over society with those who support theonomy as wanting the greatest control and those who vie for Christian Paternalism as wanting the least control.

Though such Christians would like to think that they are in the driver's seat in advancing Change-1, they are mistaken. The current, and shadow, driver for Change-1 is a corrupt oligarchy. We should note that a corrupt oligarchy is the logical consequence of Neoliberal Capitalism. And Neoliberal Capitalism is not the form of Capitalism that my fellow baby-boomers and I, and at least some aging Gen-Xers, grew up under. Neoliberal Capitalism, as pointed out by a past article (click here for the article), is epitomized in the Genesis story of Cain who after killing his brother Abel, tried to rhetorically ask God if he was his brother's  keeper. Neoliberal Capitalism promotes Social Darwinism. And that means that everyone is solely responsible for their own perdicament regardless of their starting point. And so Neoliberal Capitalism promotes the idea that none of us, especially wealthy elites, are our brother's keeper. Being our brother's keeper would only infringe on the profits that businesses could make. It is as Marx described the Capitalism of his day when he said the following (click here for the reference):

'The bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations. It has pitilessly torn asunder the motley feudal ties that bound man to his “natural superiors”, and has left remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked selfinterest, than callous “cash payment”. It has drowned the most heavenly ecstasies of religious fervour, of chivalrous enthusiasm, of philistine sentimentalism, in the icy water of egotistical calculation.'

One doesn't have to agree with Marx's analysis of the capitalism of his day or his proposed solutions to the oppression of the bourgeoisie to see how the above quote applies to our current form of capitalism under Trump. From the beginning of his current term, any policy or law that offered help to the vulnerable which did not result in a net profit for the government was targeted for either immediate or future cuts and/or eventual elimination. His tariff policies sought to put our trade relationships with every nation, but Russia, on a profit making venture. His government has been pursuing policies that increased the profits of business elites, such as big oil,  regardless of the  costs forced on consumers. And because of what Trump wants to spend on the military, the government, under his control, has been slashing federal  funding of social safety net programs like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and food assistance programs. Cuts in regulations and taxes also favored wealthy elites who were also beneficiaries of his last rounds of cuts and taxes.

And perhaps we should look at the mindset that Neoliberal Capitalism promotes when examining why members of Congress pass laws that allow them to particularly benefit from their day jobs.

We could also consider that inflation under Trump might have been caused on purpose in order to dissuade lawmakers from increasing taxes that would fund the reversing of his attacks on institutions. We should note that inflation under Biden was not caused by Biden's policies and by the end of his Presidential term was made comparable to infaltion under Trump during his first term in his second presidency. It is funny how commercials for Republican candidates only focus on Biden's first two years while talking about inflation and ignore inflation under Biden's third and fourth years of his presidency. Unlike the inflation under Biden, the inflation under Trump is due solely to his policies.

But what does our nation's economic direction have to do with the battle between Change-1 and Change-2? It is simple. While the former Change, under the Republican Party, is a co-enabler with Neoliberal Capitalism, the other, under the Democratic Party, simply coexists with it.

And so while Change-1 seeks to create a hierarchical society with religiously conservative Christian having the highest position, Neoliberal Capitalism seeks to establish a wealthy elite hierarchy who alone will determine the economic policies of our nation. And so the tie between them is that both favor hierarchy in their respective spheres. Hierarchy is more appealing than equality to those religiously conservative Christians  because of their penchant for authoritarianism.

Change-2 seeks to promote equality by bringing more groups out of the margins of society. This bringing groups out of the woodwork really started in the 1950s with the Civil Rights Movement. And though there were movements before Change-2, such as the Suffragettes,  it is Change-2 that has the goal of obtaining equality for marginalized citizens. And since Change-2 favors equality, it seems that it can only coexist with Neoliberal Capitalism. However, it seems that the Democratic Party leadership use Change-2 to camouflage their preference for Neoliberal Capitalism.

What most energized Change-1 was the Obergefell decision. That is because with that decision, and help from DEI programs, the LGBT community came, what politically conservaative Christians saw as being, too dangerously close to full equality for that community in society. And for too many  of my fellow religiously conservative Christians, allowing those from the LGBT community to move into a  neighborhood where equality reigns, especially in terms of marriage, was seen as bringing down the value of that neighborhood's properties--properties such as marriage. For too many of my fellow religiously conservative Christians, they were longing for the good old days when. because of  the past marginalization of the LGBT community, they could make invisible those in the LGBT community and thus pretend that the LGBT community did not exist.

And so Change-2 represents the full inclusion of all racial and religious groups, women, the LGBT community and many immigrants into society as equals.

We should note that neither Change-1 nor Change-2 have been pure and innocent in terms of how they wanted people to be treated nor were neither group without valid concern

The benefit that the above partnership of Change-1 and Neoliberal Capitalism is that it gives its ideology a solid political base of support by garnering political support from a good percentage of votes from religiously conservative Christians. Religiously conservative Christians  benefit from a smaller government favored by Neoliberal Capitalism. That smaller government both weakens the part of government that infringe. on the goals of those Christians while strengthening the intrusiveness of the Executive branch of government in ways that futher the goals of those Christians. Of course that partnership cannot last. For at some time the personal moral failures of wealthy elites will become visible to those promoting Change-1 favored values. But that won't occur until our democracy is long gone.

And so where does that leave us. As a religiously cnservative Christian, I strongly favor the kind of society that Change-2 promotes. Therefore, despite my pro-life beliefs, I have supported Change-2 with my votes for Democratic Party Candidates. However Neoliberalism leaves us with a mixed marriage of a more less egalitarian society in cultural terms with an economy based on hierarchy. The trouble with that is that it allows Neoliberal Capitalism to foster economic injustices on the nation as wealth becomes more and more paired with political power.

And so must vote for candidates that favor Change-2, which means that we must vote for Democratic Party candidates. And while we fervently strive to gain a current political victory for Change-2, we must realize that our work is far from over should we succeed. For once we secure and maintain that first victory, we must work to undo Neoliberal Capitalism whether that involves a return to the Bretton-Woods System or install some kind of hybrid between Socialism and Capitalism. Perhaps the elimination of Neoliheral Capitalism can at least partially quell the previously mentioned king-of-the-hill battle between Change-1 and Change-2.

We need to fight against hierarchy in society and strive for equality in our nation's economy. However, equality in our nation's economy must be carefully defined. It does not mean that everyone is  earning the same income. Instead, equality in our nation's economy requires that the concerns of those from each economic class must receve equal attention and concern so that all groups rise or sink together. It means that, regardless of one's economic class, one must work for the well-being of those in other economic classes and not just for their own welfare. For in doing so, we might provide and example for pursuing and maintaining equality in society.

 


Tuesday, October 27, 2026

Views From The Outside For October 27, 2026

 Views From The Outside

The purpose of this page is to list news stories and reports from mostly Western sources outside of the U.S. You can use Google Translate to translate articles that are printed in another language. 

So far, news sources include:

International

From Canada

From England

From France

From Germany

From Russian Source 

From Spain

From Switzerland

From Ukraine


<< Previous Views                                                        Next Views >>


Monday, October 26, 2026

I Kind Of Voted Today

The wife and I went in to vote early. Only because of tremors I have had since the 1980s, I needed the wife to fill out the form and mark the ballot.

Gone are the days when I could afford to vote for 3rd party candidates. Those days are in the past because of the current corruption and insanity of the Republican Party. Conservative parties do not need to be insane like today's Republican Party. But what we see now is the result of authoritarianism infecting the party and revolving around a leader who needs serious help, not power. Trump is, like his hero, Vlad Putin, not facing reality. Only Putin has much more intelligence and a better hold on reality than Trump. But one of the tragedies of our time is found in the fact that as either leader gets more militarily aggressive, the closer mankind comes to experiencing mutually assured destruction as warned against in the Russell-Einstein Manifesto (click here for the source). 

Of course the Democratic Party is no prize. Run by a bought out DNC, the Democratic Party is responsible for making Trump and his cohort seem like the only rational choice to many Americans. I have run into some of those American Trump voters and though that group is not a monolith, one characteristic they have in common is ignorance spurred by taking up residence in a small information bubble.

The short of it is that in almost every single federal, state, and local election, a vote for a Republican is a vote that helps enable the Trump's agenda. It is a vote for recreating America in Russia's image. And, finally, it is a vote for Vlad Putin. Neoliberalism has taken over much of the world and its logical consequence are corrupt oligarchies like the one that rules over Russia. And though we should vote for the Dems here, a vote for them is not necessarily a vote against Neoliberalism. In most cases, it is simply a vote that slows down Neoliberalism to a crawl at best. But at least electing Dems will protect the free speech rights of those who oppose Neoliberalism.




Friday, October 23, 2026

We Need To Be Relentless

Bulgarian Bulge by Don Ellis

The above link is to one of my favorite pieces of music with one of my favorite recorded piano improvisations. For the technically minded, the time signature of this music continually switches between 33/16 and 36/16. It is Bulgarian folk music played by a jazz big band recorded in 1971. I  have been enjoying learning how to play a piano version of this music thanks to the graciousness and generosity of Ellis's then pianist, Milcho Leviev, who is originally from Bulgaria and who helped me start to learn how to play it. And though I cannot play the piano version of this piece like he can and how it should be played, I have had, and still have, fun trying to learn how to play it. It is my favorite piece of music to play. I will always be grateful for the kindness that Leviev showed to me.

If you access the link, you might be required to login into a Gmail account--I am not sure if non-gmail accounts are recognized by Youtube--in order to play this particular Youtube page. I am providing this link and pointing to the last part of Leviev's solo because, if my music knowledge is correct, it is based on a part of the 4th movement of Beethoven's 5th Symphony only it is played in 33/16--that is if my music knowledge is correct. Regardless of whether that is correct, the theme played by Leviev repeats around 5 times with variations and to me, this points to the title of this blog article. To me, the last part of his improvisation conjures up the notion of being relentless. And for any of us who oppose Trump's authoritarian direction for our government, we, not just seasoned activists, need to step up and be relentless in our opposition to Trump and where he is leading our nation. Again, we, which involves everyone who opposes the direction in which Trump is leading our nation, need to step up, show up, and peacefully and legally act up.

Where is Trump leading our nation? Even before the 2024 election, either it was stated in this blog or I had said to individuals and in comments on the internet, that if Trump is elected, Russia will be our future. And it isn't just the corruption of his administration, his zeal for more and more power, his suppression of free speech on an institutional level, and his use of religion as a façade for the corrupt oligarchy is for the ever growing authoritarian rabbit hole he, and a gang of seemingly disjoint groups, are taking this nation . But his domestic policies are not the only indicators of  his authoritarian direction, consider his foreign policies, especially his actions  and words about Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine, as well as who he seems to admire the most. 

At the beginning, he blamed Zelensky and Ukraine for the war as he was making some false claims about it. He really never condemned the invasion nor did he put pressure on  Putin to stop. And now, his support for Putin and Russia has become oververt and exlicit. And in the proposed summit between JinPing, Putin, and Trump, it appears that what a former MI6 chief predicted: a world dominated by three strongman leaders who divy up the nations between themselves (click here for the blog article).

Why Trump wants to lead our nation down that path is not  yet clear. Is it because of his admiration for Puting? Or is it because Putin has enough dirt on Trump to make him act like a puppet? Is it a combination of the two? Or are there some other reasons?

We should note that Trump has some notable domestic allies who are supporting/enabling  his actions. First, there are many of my fellow religiously conservative Christians who have a penchant for authoritarianism that now includes the intense fear of the LGBT community having escaped its prison of marginalization. According to some of them, a dictator like Putin who oppresses that community in Russia is preferable to a democracy in which they would have to share the nation as equals. That is because to Putin and at least some who follow Trump, Democracy brings decadence. It is as if the SCOTUS Obergefell decision was the last straw in the moral degradation of our nation. Of course the only morals that they are considering are related to sex. For when it comes to the dehumanization and the following expolitation and abuse of groups based on race, sexual orientation, gender identity, and one's biological sex, such are not signs of moral degredation.

Of course there are also the techno-oligarchs and other wealthy elites who are either Trump's enablers or his puppet masters. For the sake of profits, these wealthy elites have morphed into moral chamelions who do whatever they  can to appease the current governmental leaders of our nation. Their ability to change  their moral colors come from their desire to keep maximizing their corporate profits.

When we see the power that Trump has already garnered, the direction of the future of our nation in which Trump is leading us, and those who have Trump's back, we are in a desparate situation. And so  we find that our Obi-Wan Kenobi, our only hope, has a name is spelled 'RELENTLESS.' These midterms might be our last stand for an unforeseen time period. It is like we are in game 7 of the last World Series that will afterwards  will not be played for an indeterminant amount of time and so for all players, including all pitchers regardless of their series workload, we must have an 'all hands on deck' attitude. All of us, not just us seasoned activists, must be relentless in peacefully and legally resisting Trump's Presidency. 

And part of that resistance involves voting against almost every Republican candidate. Because, for almost every Republican candidate, a vote for a Republican is a vote that further enables the Revolution that the Trump-led Republican party is pursuing. We should expect that Trump's authoritarianism will, IMO,  increase significantly if Trump's party holds majorities in Congress.

One more thing must be said. What is now needed the most by this country is for more Americans to become less consumer oriented and more activist active. That does not mean that we make a complete break from being happy consumers--that is if we can afford to be that way. It does mean that, at this point in time, we become more activist and less consumerist in how we live our lives. This is how we must be if we are to save our Democracy from the logical concequence of our current form of Capitalism: a corrupt oligarachy. The midterms just might be our last chance to stop Trump's express train motoring toward a Russian style government.



Tuesday, October 20, 2026

Views From The Outside For October 20, 2026

 Views From The Outside

The purpose of this page is to list news stories and reports from mostly Western sources outside of the U.S. You can use Google Translate to translate articles that are printed in another language. 

So far, news sources include:

International

From Canada

From England

From France

From Germany

From Russian Source 

From Spain

From Switzerland

From Ukraine


<< Previous Views                                                        Next Views >>