WHAT'S NEW

About
My Other Blog
Blog Schedule
NEW
Movie Links
08/13/2026
Past Blog Posts
Various &
a Sundry Blogs Update 07/03/2026
Favorite
Websites--updated 07/03/2026'
My Stuff
On The Web, Updated 06/28/2026
Audio-Visual Updated: 08/08/2026
Favorite
Articles --
last updated 08/13/2026
This Month's Scripture Verse:

1 But false prophets also appeared among the people, just as there will also be false teachers among you, who will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing swift destruction upon themselves. 2 Many will follow their indecent behavior, and because of them the way of the truth will be maligned; 3 and in their greed they will exploit you with false words; their judgment from long ago is not idle, and their destruction is not asleep..
II Peter 2:1-3

SEARCH THIS BLOG

Showing posts with label Police Violence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Police Violence. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 7, 2023

Perhaps To Get Better Law Enforcement, We Need To Become A Better Society

 George Carlin said that the reason why we have selfish, ignorant leaders is because society is made up of selfish, ignorant people. Two to four decades ago, I remember a college coach commenting on why the players then were getting trouble more often was because what we were seeing in the players is what we were seeing in society. 

And so now, after the murder of Tyre Nichols, we see another renewed call for just law enforcement. It's a valid call after the unnecessary and brutal use of force by some police officers in responding to a traffic violation. This valid call is simply a repeat of many calls that been made after unnecessary and brutal force was responsible in the death of person, a black male again. What will it take to effectively answer the call for police reform?

There is no single answer to that question because there are many factors involved. One might be to make funds available to provide professional mental health help for all police officers. Such would not necessarily be a comment on the quality of people who are law enforcement officers. Instead, it would be a comment on the stresses and strains of what can be an extremely demanding job that could make many of us vulnerable to act as monsters on occasion. 

But in looking for the parts of the solution that could reduce the number of times that police officers abuse the people they confront or have to apprehend, we, as a society, must look into a non-magic mirror. After, what provides the pool of people who apply to become police officers? It's society. Just as our politicians provide a reflection of society as well as our athletes, so to those from many other occupations. And one of them is law enforcement.

What negative actions have we seen in law enforcement that we have not seen in society? Is it racism? Is it violence? Is it a tribal response to accusations where one's own is protected from being held accountable? And if we add to that the tremendous stresses and strains that properly doing police work entails that our police officers come from our ranks in society, we can easily see plenty of problems both on the horizon and in the headlines. And thus as a society, the more selfish we are, the more racist we are, the less self-control we exercise, the more partiality we show, the more punitive we are, the more anger we have and violent we allow ourselves to be, the more corrupt we are, the more we see that in people many occupations including law enforcement. After all, our police officers are not aliens from another planet or galaxy or universe. Rather, they are people like ourselves or our family members or our neighbors, or our friends, or are people we don't know with whom we share society.

Drawing attention to the kind of society from which our police officers come is not to excuse the horrific brutality shown to Tyre Nichols. But drawing attention to society in this instance might just help us prevent and another brutal murder committed by the police. Certainly we can't excuse the actions or lack of actions of those involved in the murder of Tyre Nichols. But neither can we afford to stress individual responsibility and accountability to the point that we don't hold society accountable for the number of times this kind of violence has occurred. Unjust police violence occurs too many times to interpret by saying that there are just a few bad apples in the law enforcement barrel. On the other hand, when one considers the state of American society along with the stresses and strains of enforcing the law, perhaps we shouldn't be surprised that unjust police violence does not appear in the headlines more often.

If we want better politicians, police officers, athletes, business people, and so forth, our society has to improve. On the one hand, we want to hold individuals accountable for their actions instead of scapegoating society. But on the other hand, we can't ignore how society contributes to the moral failures of each individual.





Tuesday, April 27, 2021

The Verdict Is In

 The trial for Derek Chauvin, the police officer charged with killing George Floyd, is over. The verdict is in. And the verdict was guilty. But is that the verdict referred to in the title of this article?

In reality, the verdict both has been in for a long time and is in everyday that an unarmed person of color is killed by the police. It is the verdict that keeps repeating itself with the same finding. Only this verdict doesn't pronounce a judgment on any one individual, it pronounces a judgment on our whole nation, on all of us. And I imagine that other nations have guilty verdicts constantly hovering over them too.

Considering the history of our nation, the continual police killings of unarmed Blacks might lead us to the conclusion that some parts of Jim Crow never ended. Here, we should note that Jim Crow lasted roughly 90 years. In that time period, around 3,959 Blacks were hung (click here). That works out to an average, perhaps on the high end, of 44 per year.

Now compare that with today as it applies to police killings of unarmed people of color such as Blacks, Latinos, and Native Americans. How close to 44 per year do those statistics have to come before we admit that the problem continues? Not knowing the actual statistics, suppose that more Blacks were killed by Blacks than killed by racists during most of the Jim Crow years, would that imply that Jim Crow did not exist?

Deniers who refuse to believe that we still have systemic racism in our nation will correctly tell us that today, far more Blacks are killed by Blacks than by the police. But a similar statistic applies to Whites killed by Whites as well. And the difference in percent between the two statistics is 8%. These same deniers will claim that more homicides are committed by Blacks than whites. But homicide is not the only violent crime in America. When one checks the statistics, one finds that Whites commit more violent crimes than Blacks.

In addition, those same deniers only look at race when quoting their statistics. They fail to look at the economic class and type of community violators belong to. These deniers seem to support racial profiling as practiced by some police officers. What they seem unexposed to is that a 2006 FBI Bulletin warned us about the White Supremacists becoming police officers (click here for reference). A PBS article, citing an Los Angeles Times article gave more specific information about that regarding Los Angeles, Illinois, Texas, and Ohio (click here for reference). We should also note that killings are not the only way in which racial bias and even violence is exercised against people of color.

Some deniers of systemic racism in our nation are idealists. They prefer to think of themselves and our nation as having changed since the Civil Rights Movement. They want to be color-blind people as one of their heroes, Martin Luther King Jr., was. But is their version of color-blindness the same that possessed King? After all, did King believe that mentioning the races of a police officer involved and that of unarmed victims of police violence invokes racism?

I remember reading a book by James Cone, a renowned theologian, that was, in part, about what it was like to grow up during Jim Crow. He wrote about how he and his family worried each time that his father came home late from work. They worried about whether his father was a victim of the race-based violence that was part of Jim Crow. Are too many things the same today as they were back then? The answer to that question helps determine the verdict on whether our nation still harbors systemic racism.



Friday, September 4, 2020

A Conservative Christian View Of Police And Protests Shows Shortsightedness

R.R. Reno (click here for personal info) just wrote an article for the First Things blog that seemed to criticize the police for not being confrontational enough with protesters some of whom were destroying property. In his article, he makes the following claim:

Since George Floyd’s death, civil authorities have done everything possible to avoid deadly encounters.


 Reno calls much of their current approach 'containment' in contrast to 'confrontation.' In Reno's view, it isn't that containment is always wrong, but it has been overused here. As a result, not only has there been preventable property destruction, too much containment has led to vigilantism (click here for the article).

Perhaps the most revealing line about Reno's perspective precedes the above quote:

News of street violence makes my heart sink.

    When we combine those two statements together, we see that              Reno shows more concern over the reaction to the shootings than       the shootings themselves. Such is a view of a privileged person.

    Here we should note the human tendency to judge the actions of       others as if they are reacting from the same context, with generally    the life experiences as one's own context with life experiences. To      give an example, I remember corresponding with a member of          BLM  and telling my friend about how the police gently escorted        those who were engaging in civil disobedience at a protest in             suburban area. My friend, because of their own life experiences,         had difficulty in believing what I wrote. At the same time, one of       friends who lives around me could not believe the accounts of          police brutality that I relayed to them when I was discussing     misconduct by the police. Why? That was because he had neither      experienced, nor witnessed,  nor knew anyone who had been abused   by the police.

 Other factors can be involved in how we receive news about police violence as well. Those who are conservative authoritarians, which is a distinct possibility for Reno, naturally side with recognized authority figures such as the police. Those who are more anti-authoritarian might tend to assume that the police always are abusive when dealing with people.

Then there is the race issue. Whites have generally treated with less suspicion and more favortism by many police officers than Blacks have. So Whites might tend to be more open to favorable stories about the police than Blacks are. And that is especially true for those Blacks who have either be abused by the police or know someone who has been. But race is not the only contributing factor here, economic class is as well in determining what people tend to believe about the police.

Having said all of that, we need to get back to the quotes from Reno. The first quote points to an assumption of innocence for the police. It also separates the conditions of the protests from the protests. If police have done everything to 'avoid deadly encounters,' then why do we have two more examples of police abuse? Those two examples are the shootings of Rayshard Brooks and Jacob Blake. If the police to do not want to risk deadly encounters during protests, then why continue to conduct unjustified attempts on life which has been a cause for the protests?

But we should also point out clear police misconduct when determining whether police have done everything to avoid deadly confrontations. That misconduct ranges from the pushing down and then ignoring their victim as he was down injured of a 75-year protester in Buffalo. And to the attitude of the police regarding that matter, when two police officers involved in the assault were disciplined, 57 officers from that unit resigned in protest. Or we could go documented police attacks against protesters, medics, journalists and legal observers (click here and there). We should note that just because actions did not result in death, does not imply that such actions did not risk the death of the targets.

Also, if police were so concerned with avoiding deadly confrontations, why did they let a 17-year-old, untrained kid with an assault rifle walk toward a protest? Did they not know that that could easily lead to a deadly confrontation? Such would be unlikely.

Thus it seems that Reno's claim that the police have done what they could to 'avoid deadly encounters' seems flawed.

The second quote is even problematic. Where is Reno's expressed concern for the 3 men who have been either killed or seriously wound by unnecessary police violence? Why is the destruction of property some that saddens Reno but the flagrant use of force against Blacks does not produce a sorrow worthy of mention?

Later on, Reno writes the following;

Protecting property from theft and destruction is one of the fundamental functions of government.
And yet where is Reno's statement about protecting lives as also being one of the functions of government? As a religious leader, why does he more strongly express a concern for property than for lives?

The title of Reno's article is: The Rule Of Law Imperiled. But is the rule of law only imperiled when, in anger and anguish, protesters flaunt the law in the destruction of property? Or should Reno consider that when when officers of the court and state act unlawfully, then the rule of law is under attack too?

Finally we should realize that it is a sign of privilege to think that the current unrest began with the protests. For many, but not all, Blacks, the unrest today is simply a continuation of the conflict that started here in 1619. But because Whites like me don't have many of the life experiences that many Blacks have had, we are at risk for being at least partially blind to the whole picture of what is going on today.

 

Monday, December 3, 2018

ONIM For December 3, 2018

10 Best Fact Checking Sites Found Here.

If you are not sure about the validity of a news story linked to below, you can use  mediabiasfactcheck.com to check out the credibility of the source of most of the stories linked to here.
 
Christian News


World News


Israel-Palestine News


Donald Trump News

Pick(s) Of The Litter


Just For Fun








Monday, August 20, 2018

ONIM For August 20, 2018

10 Best Fact Checking Sites Found Here.

If you are not sure about the validity of a news story linked to below, you can use  mediabiasfactcheck.com to check out the credibility of the source of most of the stories linked to here.

Christian News


World News


Israel-Palestine News


Donald Trump News


Pick(s) Of The Litter


Just For Fun 


References

Monday, April 9, 2018

ONIM For April 9, 2018

10 Best Fact Checking Sites Found Here.

If you are not sure about the validity of a news story linked to below, you can use  mediabiasfactcheck.com to check out the credibility of the source of most of the stories linked to here.

Christian News

World News


Israel-Palestine News

Donald Trump News


Pick(s) Of The Litter

Just For Fun 


Monday, April 2, 2018

ONIM For April 2, 2018


10 Best Fact Checking Sites Found Here.

If you are not sure about the validity of a news story linked to below, you can use  mediabiasfactcheck.com to check out the credibility of the source of most of the stories linked to here.

Christian News

World News

Israel-Palestine News

Donald Trump News


Pick(s) Of The Litter


Just For Fun