WHAT'S NEW

About
My Other Blog
Blog Schedule
NEW
Movie Links
Updated- 10/28/2026
Past Blog Posts
Various &
a Sundry Blogs Update 07/03/2026
Favorite
Websites--updated 07/03/2026'
My Stuff
On The Web, Updated 06/28/2026
Audio-Visual Updated: 10/28/2026
Favorite
Articles --
last updated 08/13/2026
This Month's Scripture Verse:

1 But false prophets also appeared among the people, just as there will also be false teachers among you, who will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing swift destruction upon themselves. 2 Many will follow their indecent behavior, and because of them the way of the truth will be maligned; 3 and in their greed they will exploit you with false words; their judgment from long ago is not idle, and their destruction is not asleep..
II Peter 2:1-3

SEARCH THIS BLOG

Showing posts with label LGBT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LGBT. Show all posts

Friday, March 10, 2017

Should We Shun Beauty, The Beast, And Lefou?

The newest outrage for my fellow religiously conservative Christians (a.k.a., flaming fundamentalists) is the new Disney movie Beauty And The Beast. They are upset about a part of the movie and thus, unlike me, refuse to see it for that part--I simply refuse to see it because it is  Disney movie. But they have a more specific gripe. Some of my fellow religiously conservative Christians are boycotting the movie because among the array of living furniture and other objects in the Beast's castle is a homosexual who has a homosexual moment in the movie.

Some of the complaints about this part of the move should embarrass the complainers for their hysteria, but they lack self-awareness. However, there is a very sound article on the movie, as well as the subject of Christianity and homosexuality by Dan Chappell (click here for bio). Writing on his own blog, Chappell takes a very balanced approach to answering the question of whether Christians should take their kids to see this movie or even see it themselves. And in answering that question, he addresses some of the problems with the Christian hysteria over the movie (click here for Chappell's article). In fact, my advice for any readers here is to forego the rest of this review and read Chappell's article. For his points are most appropriate and his article is well written and is better written than this review.

For those who didn't take my advice, we could break down Chappell's review to theses parts: our role as Christians in society and Chappell's analysis of the parts of the movie containing the homosexual character and moment.


Regarding our role in society, Chappell quickly notes that we Christians need to learn how to live as 'sojourners in a pluralist society.' Thus, we are not to try to conquer society in order to make it a suitable home for ourselves. Instead, we are traveling through temporarily in hopes that we can spread the Gospel while here. Also, when we are selective with the immoralities at which we show disdain, we can in no way honor Christ. And when showing our disapproval for the different immoralities in society, we must remember that other issues are also at hand. These issues include love and compassion. Here we should note that the more legalistic we Christians are in how we live out our faith or, as some tend to do, wear our religion on our sleeves, the more we tend to ask 'what's love got to do with it' when sharing the Scriptures with others.

Next, unlike many a religiously conservative Christian who yells 'agenda, agenda' each time they see any mention of homosexuality in the arts, Chappell sees Lefou's homosexual feelings and the moment as merely a recognition of what already exists. Chappell notes that the feelings Lefou experiences are also experienced by brothers and sisters in Christ.

In returning back to our role in society, we can react to the LGBT community as the Pharisees of Jesus's day reacted to "sinners." That is we can coldheartedly judge them from above. When we do this we will try to push those in the LGBT community to society's margins in order for us to feel more at home in society. Or we can combine both the truth of the Gospel and love in an effort to give witness to the Gospel by how we live in our society for what it is. Chappell notes that love and compassion do not  cause us to sacrifice our moral values. Instead, we should learn how to live out our values in a messy world.

Using different words, Chappell's approach is similar to the approach this blog has taken regarding how to regard and treat the LGBT community in society. It is this blog's position that instead of Christians seeking a place of supremacy over those in the LGBT community and others in society, we should look to share society with those who are different from us as equals. And thus we should work together to create a society that is just and based on equality. And even though it is then that we can open the doors and fully preach the Gospel to others, sharing the Gospel should not be the reason why we strive to base a society on equality. We should do so because it is the right thing to do.


     
     
     

Monday, May 2, 2016

ONIM For May 2, 2016

Christian News

World News

Pick(s) Of The Litter



Monday, February 24, 2014

ONIM For Feb 24, 2014

Christian News


World News



Pick(s) Of The Litter

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

The Even Darker Side Of Putin's Anti-Gay Agenda

The trouble with isms is the people who pursue them. Such people tend to be purists. And because they are purists, they are exclusive. Why be a purist? One pursues purism for at least one of the following two reasons: control and glory. All to often, people seek control as a response to fear while people seek glory in order to feel significant.

Because of the above, the more one runs after an ism, the more one shuts out others from being insensitive to their sufferings to denying their contributions to vilifying them as monsters. The above applies to racism, nationalism, many ideologically based ism, and other kinds of isms.

Thus, we should include the above when examining Vladimir Putin, Russia's leader, and his anti-gay agenda. That is because two isms are being consistently associated with the anti-gay policies he supports in Russia. These two isms are conservatism and nationalism. And whether Putin is taking an opportunistic ride on the popularity, in Russia that is, of these two isms or he is a true believer, he has securely attached himself and his anti-gay-rights position to them.

Putin has described himself and Russia as the champions for conservative values. And he also explicitly rejects/resents Western liberalism's sometimes hypocritical attempts to impose its values on Russia in this matter. He says that this is a violation of Russia's democracy . 

Such a defense revives old memories of the South's response to the Civil Rights movement. "Mixing Is Communism" read some of the signs defending segregation and Jim Crow. The advantage that Civil Rights workers of the past had that today's Western Liberals don't was that there was a centralized authority to which the Southern states were answerable. So all Civil Rights workers had to do to start facilitating changes in the South was to gain the sympathies of enough federal lawmakers.

But today's world does not even consist of a confederation. That is because the world's strongest nation, the US, has followed the rule of force because it can. Thus, whatever moral force that the UN could exercise in this matter has been decimated. So the only outside pressure available to those concerned with the rights of gays consists of economic pressure through boycotts and political pressure through isolation. But such is unlikely since Russia has resources to sell and, with some legitimacy, been involved in mediating some of the world's hotspots. 

Another Russian reminder of the old South's resistance are laws used to punish and imprison those in the LBGT community and their activists. While Putin insists that there is equality regardless of sexual orientation and that his only concern is preventing children from being exposed to homosexual propaganda, the law is written with a lot of leeway given to law enforcement and vagueness for potential arrestees. So while Putin claims there is equality for all regardless of sexual orientation, an act that recognizes the need to placate dissent and save some face, LGBT activists who publicly state that homosexuality is not perversion are arrested and imprisoned. At the same time,  gays and LGBT activists have been beaten and even tortured with impunity.

In addition, Putin has recently announced a reversal in the birthrate of Russian children--a previous drop in Russia's birthrate was blamed on homosexuality (click here). This is described as being important for the future of Russia's growth. We should note that while the US has been recognized as the world's only superpower, in some ways, Russia has never ceased being a superpower. After all, how else would anyone describe a country whose nuclear arsenal could easily destroy the world many times over. Where they have failed to maintain their superpower status is their ability to project power throughout the world. But that is beginning to change.

It wasn't too long ago that America was considering deploying anti-ballistic missile site bases in NATO's eastern countries to which Russia responded with the threat of using tactical nuclear weapons in a first strike. Combine that with how Russia is now looking to play key roles in brokering international conflicts and hot spots, along with its new weapons programs, we are looking a nation that is seeking to restore some of its glory and control from the past. But at the same time, we should note the harshness with which it has met dissent at home and this has occurred long before the conviction and imprisonment of its oppositional artists, Nadya Tolokonnikova and Masha Alyokhina. As of 2010, 19 Russian journalists had been killed (click here) including Anna Politkovskaya. Today, Russia controls much of the media. We should also note Russia's past brutal treatment of Chechnya under Putin's leadership.

In order to reclaim power and prestige, unity is a necessity. And the more unity is desired, the more dissent and diversity are seen as Kryptonite. Putin is directing Russia to find that unity in the traditional values of conservatism and nationalism. We should note that combining strong-armed tacts with both a call to return to traditional values and nationalism was a trademark of Germany's Nazis. So we shouldn't be surprised that Russia's Neo-Nazis are the ones attacking gays and LGBT activists as well as Arabs, the latter has been occurring in the Ukraine. We should also note that gay rights activists have been attacked by those from the Russian Orthodox Church and "pro-Kremlin youth groups" (click here) . 

Putin is in the midst of another power grab. This can be seen not just in his domestic agenda, but in his foreign policies as well. And our concern here is that his anti-gay agenda indicates what we can expect from him in the future. And that future looks more ominous everyday because he has wrapped himself up in isms that are harshly excluding gays and others who are different in Russian society. And he doing that in ways that are reminiscent of an atrocity filled past.


Monday, September 9, 2013

ONIM For September 9, 2013

Christian News


World News