WHAT'S NEW

About
My Other Blog
Blog Schedule
NEW
Movie Links
08/13/2026
Past Blog Posts
Various &
a Sundry Blogs Update 07/03/2026
Favorite
Websites--updated 07/03/2026'
My Stuff
On The Web, Updated 06/28/2026
Audio-Visual Updated: 08/08/2026
Favorite
Articles --
last updated 08/13/2026
This Month's Scripture Verse:

1 But false prophets also appeared among the people, just as there will also be false teachers among you, who will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing swift destruction upon themselves. 2 Many will follow their indecent behavior, and because of them the way of the truth will be maligned; 3 and in their greed they will exploit you with false words; their judgment from long ago is not idle, and their destruction is not asleep..
II Peter 2:1-3

SEARCH THIS BLOG

Showing posts with label White Nationalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label White Nationalism. Show all posts

Friday, May 3, 2019

Breaking Away From Racism Is Hard To Do

Jemar Tisby (click here for a bio) has recently attempted to address the problem of racism in conservative American churches. The title of the article is Why White Nationalism Tempts White Christians (click here for the article). And though he has some very insightful things to say, there is a hint that  Tisby is fishing for a more comprehensive approach as to why White Christians find it difficult to away from white nationalism and racism.

What are some of the very good things things Tisby says?  Below is a partial list
. We should first note that Tisby uses the recent mass shooting in a California synagogue as a backdrop for his discussion. He does so because the shooter there was a member of a very conservative Christian denomination: the Orthodox Presbyterian Church. And this has a special interest for me because I too am a member of that denomination.

  • Too often Christian individuals and institutions act as if general statements condemning bigotry and saccharine assertions of racial and ethnic equality are sufficient to combat white nationalism.
     
  • White denominations, especially in the theologically Reformed branch of the church, should hold specific workshops, classes and special events explaining white nationalist beliefs and tactics so their members can guard against subversion.
     
  • White churches and leaders must bring members who express white nationalist views or sympathies under church discipline, with the ultimate goal of discipleship and restoration. But, if necessary, suspension from the Lord’s Supper and excommunication should be an option.
     
  • Maybe white racists and nationalists can sit comfortably in the pews of certain churches because whenever calls for social justice arise their leaders say that such issues are a “distraction” from the gospel.
     
  • Their view of the gospel only focuses on issues of personal salvation and individual piety. It never touches broader matters of systemic and institutional injustice. It has little to say about white supremacy and its specific manifestations such as white nationalism and the alt-right.
We should also note that the magazine of the Orthodox Presbyterian Church, New Horizons, had just, previously to the shooting, published an issue where a number of articles dealt with racism (click here for that issue). In that article, there is a reference made to the Orthodox Presbyterian Church's 1974 report on racism (click here for that report). Here we should note that within the last two years, other conservative American denominations have made public statements about their dealings with racism.

Now the mentioning of the most recent edition of the New Horizons magazine that deals with racism and the reference to the OPC's 1974 report on racism is because what is missing in those works coincide with what is missing in Tisby's article. And what is missing, at least for the OPC, is an important reason why racism can stealthly find a home in that denomination. The reason why those works are incomplete is because of the denomination's insularity. For almost nowhere in the New Horizons articles or the OPC report on racism are there any outside references that would address racism as it exists in America.


The reason for the denomination's insularity is because of its theology. And this is where, as Tisby wrote in the article, the denomination's theology interferes with its battle against racism and white nationalism. The denomination's theology says that God's Word is sufficient in terms of teaching us what to believe and how to live. And because of that, the OPC's approach to racism have rested solely on using the Scriptures to address racism. But the problem with that approach isn't that the Scriptures are insufficient. The problem is that Scriptures give us little to no information, history and insight into why racism in America has taken the shape it has.

And because of the denomination's insularity, what others have said regarding how we should battle racism has also been ignored. At this point we can say that it has been ignored for reasons cited above from Tisby's article. That insights from social justice activists regarding how to contend against the social injustices of racism are looked at as an optional secondary information that do not explicitly direct us to the Scriptures. Too many of us believe that if we read the Scriptures, we will know all that we need to know about how to resist and confront racism. But that approach causes us deliberately neglect to read insights from people who have observed what is involved in white nationalism and racism in America.
 

Here we should note that Martin Luther King Jr. tells us that racism is due to a preference of society for things rather than people and that racism is inseparably bound to economic exploitation/materialism (King would vary as to which one he would include in the list) and militarism so that one cannot eliminate racism by targeting racism alone. We should note that a vast majority of conservative American Christians have no exposure to King's view of the entanglements that maintain racism's web.  As for what King said, it is below (click here for a source):
 I am convinced that if we are to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. We must rapidly begin the shift from a "thing-oriented" society to a "person-oriented" society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered.
We might also note from King's quote, that in order to topple racism, we have to be ready to tip some of conservative American Christians' sacred cows. This is a point that Tisby also seems to have overlooked. Obviously, we need to note that America was founded as a white nationalist nation mostly by white nationalists. But if that isn't enough, if society being thing-oriented rather than person-oriented maintains racism, then our cherished economic system, Capitalism, must also be made vulnerable to a very cutting examination and challenge. For American Capitalism  pushes society toward being 'thing-oriented.'

Despite what Tisby has missed, he gives many helpful insights into how conservative American Churches, like the Orthodox Presbyterian Church, can address its and society's problems with racism and white nationalism. His article deserves to be read and reread a number of times.







Friday, May 18, 2018

A Warning That Is Too Little, Too Late

Trevin Wax (click here for a bio) has recently written a blogpost for his blog on the Gospel Coalition website which tries to warn religiously conservative Christians about the emergence of new and threatening conservative political ideologies that go against the Scriptures. He describes these ideologies as revolving around racism and a rejection of globalism. And that Christians must reject these new conservative ideologies just as they reject new "leftist" and have rejected political liberalism (click here for the article).

Wax's article provides a warning that is too little, too late. It is too little because Wax does not show his full capabilities in his examination oft either past political approaches or the present ones. He doesn't show his full capabilities as he reviews Machen's struggles with liberalism. And he doesn't show his full capabilities in offering specific criticisms of either the new left or new right politics that he sees as posing a danger to Christians.


But his warning also comes too late. For he speaks about an emerging white nationalism that has been tied closely to Christianity because this white nationalism rejects what is politically liberal. But such a new white nationalism doesn't exist. Why? It isn't because white nationalism doesn't exist. It is because white nationalism is as old as the colonization of North America. Our nation's founding fathers, as well as those from the next few generations that followed them, were, for the most part, white supremacists. Even some who opposed slavery and Honest Abe himself were white supremacists (click here).

We could fast forward to the days of the Civil Rights Movement. Quite often, signs held by whites who opposed the Movement associated the Movement and integration with Communism. Some in our government were all too eager to accuse Martin Luther King Jr. of being a Communist. It was conservatives who made these accusations and conservative denominations opposed the Civil Rights Movement. Some of those conservative denominations, like the PCA and SBC, apologized decades later for their support for Jim Crow and resistance to the Civil Rights Movement. And we should note that the racism that Martin Luther King Jr. battled existed throughout the nation. He observed as much racism in the North as he did in the South. The racism was often exhibited in different ways, but it was there. So it should become clear that white nationalism is a bit older thanWax seems to give it credit for.


My own experience growing up in a religiously conservative Christian home in the Northeast saw such a subtle but clear association between political conservatism and white nationalism. The difference between then and now is that the term white nationalism, was not used in public like it is today.

So Wax's warning came too late for families like the one I grew up in. Of course, that is not Wax's fault, but it is the fault of his theological predecessors. And that starts with J. Gresham Machen.

There is no doubt that Machen contributed significantly to our ability to distinguish theological liberalism and theological conservatism. But the baggage that came with the distinctions caused the baby to be thrown out with the bathwater when it came to his reaction to liberalism. That is, not just theological liberalism was tossed aside by Machen's reaction to his denomination's rejection of him, much, if not all, of political liberalism was thrown away to because of the name of 'liberal' or 'liberalism.' In short Machen, like many who possess authoritarian personality types, embraced a black-white kind of thinking that prevented them from making distinctions between theological and political liberalism and from valid politically liberal positions from invalid ones. Thus, both theological and political liberalism was rejected by Machen and, from that, the roots of today's ties between conservative Christianity and conservative politics were planted.

We should note in Wax's article that it is appropriate to accept some forms of political conservatism. But he seems to say that all of political liberalism is viewed as a threat that must be rejected by today's religiously conservative Christians. And this is despite the fact that the Civil Rights Movement was not well supported by political conservatism.

There is one other problem with Wax's approach. Wax, he is a Christian transformationalist. And like other such transformationalists, he believes that Christians are called to change the culture. That Christians are expected to interject their values into society in order to Christianize them, in a sense. Such makes evangelism easier and helps humanity better able to flourish. But such an approach implies how we should share with others. For the transformationalist approach assumes that Christians should seek a privileged place in society in order to better interject, or force, Christian values onto society. This is to be done not just for the sake of evangelism, but out of a call for stewardship. For whatever reason, what is implied by transformationalism is a place of supremacy over society for Christianity so it can better influence society and help human life flourish under the best conditions.


But seeking that privileged place in society immediately rubs against the grain of those unbelievers who are woke. They are woke because they have seen, in history, other attempts by Christians to do the same. And those  attempts had very ugly sides to them. Though certainly the Church should play the role of a prophet in calling out the corporate sins of the state and society. To avoid seeking a place of supremacy in society, we religiously conservative Christians need to collaborate with our unbelieving fellow citizens as equals so as to forge a more just society. We cannot do such collaboration while seeking supremacy over others.

What follows from how we share society with others should be obvious. If we Christians seek some place of supremacy over others in society, we will be more inclined to be insular in what we observe and read about society. That is because our need for supremacy implies that we have a more pure view of people and politics and that view can be more easily contaminated when collaborating with unbelievers. If we share society with others as equals, then we will more readily recognize that not only do we have much to contribute to society, but that we have much to learn from others as well and that unbelievers have much to contribute to both society and ourselves.




 

Monday, February 20, 2017

ONIM For February 20, 2017

Christian News

World News

Protest News

    Standing Rock Sioux - DAPL News

    Pick(s) Of The Litter