WHAT'S NEW

About
My Other Blog
Blog Schedule
Activism
Past Blog Posts
Various &
a Sundry Blogs Update 07/03/2026
Favorite
Websites--updated 07/03/2026'
My Stuff
On The Web, Updated 06/28/2026
Audio-Visual Updated: 07/30/2026
Favorite
Articles --
last updated 07/30/2026
This Month's Scripture Verse:

1 But false prophets also appeared among the people, just as there will also be false teachers among you, who will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing swift destruction upon themselves. 2 Many will follow their indecent behavior, and because of them the way of the truth will be maligned; 3 and in their greed they will exploit you with false words; their judgment from long ago is not idle, and their destruction is not asleep..
II Peter 2:1-3

SEARCH THIS BLOG

Showing posts with label State Of The Union Address. Show all posts
Showing posts with label State Of The Union Address. Show all posts

Friday, February 2, 2018

Trump's SOTU, Episode I

The problem with State of The Union (SOTU) speeches is that the basic theme is this: We must be praised. That 'we' sometimes refers to America as a country. That 'we' can also refer to American individuals. And, last but not least, that 'we' sometimes refers to the President who is speaking.  Needless to say, that 'we' should rarely, if ever, refer to previous President if that President belongs to the opposition party.

At the same time, what must also be true about the SOTU is that along with we must be praised, we must never be criticized. And, of course, the 'we' must refer to the first three groups of we listed above so that our nation, the American people and the current President are included in that 'we.' However, the previous President from the opposition party is fair game.

So how does such a speech that revolves around self-praise and shuns self-criticism play in the hands of a narcissist? It provides an opportunity for President Trump to shine because he is in his natural environment. And at that point, it is rather easy to see a narcissist who is expected to praise himself and his nation to appear "presidential" in doing so (click here for a transcript of the SOTU).

How was America praised in Trump's speech? Trump starts with listing what America had endured while never faltering. America withstood hurricanes, floods, and fires. And then Trump listed Americans who rushed into danger to save people who were being threatened by ravages of storms. 


Trump also mentions a firefighter who bravely rescued children who were trapped by a fire. 

Then Trump sent his regards to those who suffered from the disasters of water and fire and he include Puerto Rico in the list of people to whom he sent his love. But Puerto Rico needs more than just words of love. Most of the nation is still without the basics for survival.

In addition to that, Trump noted that Americans must face the domestic threat of gangs like MS-13 and the foreign threat of ISIS. He blamed the presence of MS-13 here on faulty immigration policies from the past.

Trump called America the bravest people on earth who can climb every mountain and meet every obstacle with heart and grit. And that is important because not only does our nation face internal threats from gangs and external threats from terrorists, it faces 'challenges' from rogue nations and from China and Russia. But then Trump returned to the subject of how great America is because it is a place where people can rule themselves. As Trump is closing, he says the following that should raise an infinite number of red flags to any Bible-believing Christian who is familiar with the Genesis account of the tower of Babel:
As long as we are proud of who we are, and what we are fighting for, there is nothing we cannot achieve.

But Trump modified that statement possibly to placate his religious base:
As long as we have confidence in our values, faith in our citizens, and trust in our God, we will not fail.

And what is interesting about those statements placed in next to each other in the speech, is that, according to the Bible, their premises contradict each other. One cannot be filled with pride and faith. In fact, Biblical faith is placed solely in God, not in people. And the Scriptures warn us never to say what will and will not happen in the future, because we don't know. But these statements are necessary for the SOTU because the theme of the SOTU is: We must be praised. And what attaches itself to that is that we must never be criticized.

But unfortunately, facts and logic do rear their ugly heads to spoil the self-celebration.  We should note the link between climate change, which has been significantly contributed by human activities, and some of the disasters that have befallen America. That is especially true regarding the strength of storms that so battered places like Puerto Rico and gulf coast states of the US. Or we could note the fires that ravaged the Northwest states and note that scientists are also tying the growing time period in which parts of our nation are vulnerable to fires as well as the increases in fire activity with climate change (click here and there).

And when we want to talk about the threats Americans face from gangs like MS-13, we need to go back father in time than when current immigration policies were enacted. For MS-13 itself got its start, not in Los Angeles as is commonly alleged, but in El Salvador as guerilla fighters faced off against military and para military troops that were trained by the US (click here and there and there again).



We should also note how American foreign policies played roles in the creation of groups like Al-Qaeda and ISIS. The base for Al-Qaeda came from a time period where the US supported terrorists, call "freedom fighters" by our government leaders, like Osama Bin Laden. For as long as their attacks were in a nation whose government was supported by the then Soviet Union and  Soviet troops were drawn in to fight what was hopefully an unwinnable war, our government was happy. After the Soviet Union withdrew, some of those terrorists, who formed the group Al-Qaeda, witnessed both US support of Israel's Occupation against the Palestinians and the US-Great Britain enforcement of the Iraq sanctions that caused hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children to die. That, and the presence of US troops in Saudi Arabia moved Al-Qaeda to declare war on us. Included with that war were attacks on a couple of our embassies and the 9/11 atrocities.

ISIS, on the other hand, formed after we had invaded Iraq. The destabilization of the area, along with the US imprisoning the man who would become ISIS's founder and leader, contributed greatly to the creation of ISIS.

Next, in the we must be praised parade of words that Trump used to glorify himself. And what shows the awkwardness of his praise are fact checks. Some of Trump's claims as well as their accompanying facts are below (click here for fact check source):

  • Trump's administration has created 2.4 million new jobs.
    Fact Check: the number of new jobs created since Trump took office was 1.84 million and many of those are the result of the Obama policies inherited by the Trump Administration.
  • African-American unemployment rate is at its all time lowest point
    Fact Check: unemployment for all Americans including Blacks and Hispanics have been declining for the past 7 years.
  • Wages are increasing
    Fact Check: real wages have been going up since the 1990 and rose under Obama by 4.1%. They rose 1.1% during Trump's first year.
  • Car companies are now building and increasing their facilities for the first time in a long time
  • Fact Check:  This claim is false as is seen in the past actions of BMW and Volvo. Likewise, while Toyota and Mazda have announced plans to build a plant in Alabama since Trump has become President. But the two have been working on plans for a joint venture since 2015. How much credit Trump deserves is questionable
  • The US does more to help those in need than any other country in the world
    Fact Check: The claim is true in terms of actual dollars spent, but the claim is strongly false in terms of percentage of national income given to help those in need.
  • The US is now an exporter of energy to the world
    Fact Check: The claim is false since we still import more energy than we export.
  • The Trump Administration has created the biggest tax cuts and reforms in US history.
    Fact Check: Trump's tax cut is the 8th and 4th largest tax cuts in terms of GDP and inflation respectively. Reagan's 1981 tax cuts were the largest in US history
  • Trump described the Diversity Visa Program as one where green cards are given out randomly without regard for merit or the safety of Americans.
    Fact Check: Those selected for green cards must first prove that they have a high school education or two years of work experience. In addition, they are fingerprinted and undergo background checks.

Trump made many false or misleading claims in an effort to praise his Presidency and rob his predecessor of credit for his accomplishments. Just a sample of those claims are listed above. And these claims, often made without regard for truth or accuracy, show the basic themes of Trump's SOTU as well as those of many past Presidents. Trump follows suit by praising his own administration while not mentioning the accomplishments of or taking the credit for Obama's work. 

Why do we tolerate the narcissism that is so much a part of each SOTU? Why? Perhaps, it is because some of that narcissism feeds our own egos, especially the parts that describe our nation or the political part we favor. Though hearing praise of ourselves can make us feel good, it only acts as an anesthetic when the praise is not founded in reality. And like all anesthetics, they eventually wear off and give way to pain. Eventually, the SOTU will no longer hide the pain from us. The only question that remains is whether there will be time to fix our real problems and failures once we are no longer fooled by self-praise.




 

Monday, January 26, 2015

ONIM For January 26, 2015

Christian News


World News


Pick(s) Of The Litter

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

Comments Which Conservatives Block From Their Blogs For Jan 29, 2014

This is a new category of posts. It is dedicated to those conservative blogs that have blocked my comments for various reasons. The blogpost of blocked comments will appear every Wednesday when the blog is not taking a break.



Jan 28

To Joe Carter's blogpost on the Acton blog asking why the state of the union is always strong.

The simple answer to the question is that we, meaning the country and those in power, must be praised.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To Joe Carter's blogpost on the Acton blog claiming that the war on poverty has been won


I wonder if the actual victims of poverty were consulted before this post was written. This is the predominant theme when I read or listen to conservatives as they write about poverty. For it seems that they write this or that about poverty without consulting those living in it.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To Joseph Sunde's blogpost on the Acton blog on Bonhoeffer's definition of Christian Freedom


What bothers me with this post is such a definition of liberty, which is made from a specific religious and moral context, can be used to justify one group dominating over another because it claims to be telling the other group how it ought to live. After all, the people Bonhoeffer was battling were doing just that.

Saturday, March 23, 2013

Building Our Own Tower Of Babel

Genesis 11 contains the story of the Tower of Babel. The people were wandering and had decided to build a city and tower as a tribute to themselves. In the midst of their building, God saw what it could lead to too power and thus He stopped them by causing them to speak in different languages so that people could not understand each other. This limited what they could do together.

Part of this story of the Tower of Babel is currently relived everyday. We constantly build edifices as self-praise to an imagined sense of significance. We are forever building tributes, idols to worship and bow down to, that reflect our magic mirror image. But there is one difference between today's Towers of Babel and the original. That difference is whereas with the first Tower of Babel, confusion came with the onset of different languages. In contrast, our confusion is found in a revised, self-flattering history.  

Two recently built Towers of Babel can be found in the Pentagon's observance of Martin Luther King. According to the speakers, outgoing Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, and Air Force retired Major General, Marcelite J. Harris, Martin Luther King's contributions came from his fight against racial inequality and how he inspired people to reach their potential. What was absent in any mention of King during these speeches is his fight against economic injustice and militarism--both of which he found linked to racism. There is good reason for these omissions. These omissions would be damning to the images of the nation and institutions the speakers belong to.

For those who think that King opposed racism only, please consider the following. At significant risk, Martin Luther King publicly opposed the Vietnam War effort. For this, he was not only further criticized by his opponents, he was suffered a certain alienation from some friends and allies. In addition, he was told that he was hurting the cause of racial equality.

Also consider when King was assassinated, he was confronting economic injustice; he was standing with the Memphis garbage collectors and their quest for fair pay. That is when King was assassinated. And to bring this point out would again discredit the institutions and nation that retired Major General Harris and then Secretary of Defense Panetta serve.

Thus neither Secretary of Defense Panetta and retired Major General Harris were only able to pay homage to the Martin Luther King who did not exist, to the man who opposed racial inequality only. This is because to fully honor Martin Luther King would mean to draw a critical eye on those whom they serve. To fully honor King, they would have criticize the military for taking more than its fair share of our nation's budget and resources. And to fully honor King, they would have to criticize their country's economic system because of the inequity it promotes. But because their real masters meant more to them than Martin Luther King and his passions, they used King to serve their masters rather than to challenge them.

We see a furthering of our problems in this year's State Of The Union Address (See here). According to that speech, the only faults that President Obama could see in our nation is that politicians put political party interests above national interests and that too many people and things are in need.

The problem here is that pursuing divergent party interests could be seen merely as disagreements by different groups who are trying to solve our nations problems. Never is the admission made that many of our elected leaders have no interest in solving our nation's problems outside of those troubles experienced by their major campaign contributors. In other words, the fault that President Obama should have spotlighted here is that too many of our elected leaders put self-interest and the interests of their corporate sponsors ahead of the interests of people.

We might also mention that outside of putting party interests ahead of, undefined but assumed, national interests, our nation has only needs and struggles; we have no moral failures or sins. And it is this working denial of the true causes of our problems which only ensures that our struggles will not only persevere, they will grow.

Nothing illustrates this more than the increase in our military interventions during Obama's Presidency. When President Obama campaigned for the presidency in 2008, his criticisms of Bush's war policies never included any moral judgments. Rather, his criticisms were based on business criteria. He saw Bush's use of our military as being inefficient and ineffective. This led some on the Left to speculate that Obama could engage in a plethora of new wars so long as he saw our involvement as being business smart. Never mind that we sided with terrorists in Afghanistan in fighting Al-Qaeda and the Taliban as well as violated the Nuremberg Principles when invading Iraq. So now we are stealthly involved in Africa, possibly sided with terrorists in the Libyan revolt, and assume the right to use drones to assassinate anyone in nations like Yemen and Pakistan with legal impunity. And our involvement in the Pakistan is only serving to destabilize a nation that has a significant stockpile of nuclear weapons.

Like the people from Genesis 11, our leaders are building our Towers of Babel as a self-tribute to themselves. Unlike the people from Genesis 11, they do this with words and the more we respond with silence, the more we become as complicit in building those towers as those who laid the brick and mortar in the  first Tower of Babel. And another difference is that while God sent confusion on the original builders while they were in the middle of their work; our towers of Babel start on a foundation of confusion and lies. The above contains only a partial listing.

The lie we must confront is one that says, though we have faults, we do not sin. That is because our motto follows the theme of every State Of The Union address--we must be praised. So if we must be praised, we cannot admit to sin. But the rub is that while we cannot admit to sin, we can't start solving the problems that so gravely threaten us. Another lie we must confront says that America is exceptional and is thus above the moral judgment of all other nations. Claiming to be special is normal. And the list of atrocities committed by our nation is long and known to the rest of the world.

We have one more problem that acts as the final nail on our nation's coffin. That problem is that those who should know best, our nation's Christians, are too busy reveling in patriotism and pride to speak the truth that some nonChristians have already discovered. That truth is that much of our nation's wealth has been built on the back of others and that our exceptionalism is seen more in our power than our principles. Thus, we will eventually be the cause of our own demise and the only advantage that our own Towers Of Babel will serve is that at least we will go down singing.