WHAT'S NEW

About
My Other Blog
Blog Schedule
NEW
Movie Links
08/13/2026
Past Blog Posts
Various &
a Sundry Blogs Update 07/03/2026
Favorite
Websites--updated 07/03/2026'
My Stuff
On The Web, Updated 06/28/2026
Audio-Visual Updated: 08/027/2026
Favorite
Articles --
last updated 08/13/2026
This Month's Scripture Verse:

1 But false prophets also appeared among the people, just as there will also be false teachers among you, who will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing swift destruction upon themselves. 2 Many will follow their indecent behavior, and because of them the way of the truth will be maligned; 3 and in their greed they will exploit you with false words; their judgment from long ago is not idle, and their destruction is not asleep..
II Peter 2:1-3

SEARCH THIS BLOG

Showing posts with label Biden. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Biden. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 5, 2021

The State Of American Politics

 Already we are hearing about one possible presidential candidate in 2024.  Of course that would be Donald Trump. His followers don't realize what a disaster his presidency was. His presidency, like that of George W. Bush's, left our nation in shambles. Yes, it got an assist from the Covid-19 virus. But still, Trump's judgment during the time he was in office was very suspect. 

From the beginning Trump was either enthralled or intimidated by strongman leaders. Even if we don't include Putin in the mix, he expressed jealousy over China's Jinping's maneuvering to become President for life, he was impressed by Erdogan, he congratulated  Duterte for how he handled the Philippines drug problem, and from I read from one of Woodward's book on Trump, he seemed intimidated by Jung-un of North Korea.

Trump's reelection hopes always relied on his immigration policies and the nation's economy. Moral shortcuts were seen in the Trump Administration's treatment of those who were detained though it should be mentioned that there were some similarities with how Obama's Administration also treated undocumented people. But Obama was able to talk about unwanted immigrants without using racist descriptions. 

But let's face it, we will never solve our immigration problems until we make our foreign policies and trade agreements a significant part of our immigration policies. Why is that? It is because our foreign policies and trade agreements have been instrumental in driving up the demand for people wanting to emigrate to this nation. Our foreign policies have a history of increasing the rate of violence in a nation even for the long term. There is something about supporting regime changes where the incoming ruler acts as a tyrannical dictator that can tend to make a nation more violent. As for our trade agreements, they have been partially responsible for increasing poverty in some of our trade agreement partners as the targeted beneficiary of those agreements are often corporations. That is what we saw with NAFTA.

As for our economy, Trump took shortcuts there to ramp up, or actually partially ride the coattails of his predecessor's, success. Here Trump cut environmental regulations that increased short term profits while endangering our future both with respect to climate change and environmental concerns outside of climate change. In fact, Trump did all he could to show the world that he refused to believe that climate change even existed. 

Trump's tax cuts targeted the wealthy. That and his spikes in the military budget again put America's future at risk as the they resulted in unnecessary spikes in the deficit. Many of us didn't notice this because we were convinced that Obama left the military in shambles--something that is kind of hard to do since even under Obama we were spending more money on the military than the next 8 nations combined. But as one old rock song mentioned: 'Paranoia strikes deep.'

And while we weren't watching, Trump restarted the US in a new arms race with Russia.

But what do we get with Biden? Certainly he is an authoritarian at heart though not to the degree that Trump is. He claimed that he could work with the Republicans but has yet to show that. Having floated his recovery plans earlier in the year, some non-Trump Republicans met with him to see if they could strike a deal. But Biden refused to compromise with them. As a result, Biden's infrastructure plans will have no Republican support. In fact, some of Republicans are thinking about letting America default on its loans and shutting down the government, a step that will hurt many of us.

And then there is Biden's withdrawal from Afghanistan. Certainly we needed to withdraw because we were in an unwinnable conflict with those who hosted those who attacked us on 9-11. Our troubles from Afghanistan started when Carter signed off on assistance with the predecessors of the Taliban, the Mujahideen. Here we should note that, like the Taliban, the Mujahideen strongly opposed the social reforms that the Soviet friendly Communist government was trying to continue and even add to that included an improved standing for women. Thus we have another success story for employing binary logic in a world full of continuous values.

Certainly, any withdraw from Afghanistan was going to be messy. But Biden showed insufficient effort to minimize that messiness. And he has still failed to acknowledge that he could have done a better job.

Yes, Biden has some success early in his tenure as President. But will his performance hurt the Dems chances of keeping control of at least one chamber of Congress let alone both Such is an important question because the Republican Party is still under the control of Trump. Their denial of reality, seen with Climate Change during Trump's Administration has leaped tall buildings in a single bound with their reactions and responses to the Covid crises. And they plan to center the 2022 midterms on the ludicrous accusation that the Dems are Marxist socialists--such is an insult to many of us who lean to varying degrees toward Marx. But such is the state of the Republican Party because of the deliberate ignorance possessed by many of its registered voters.

And though we could go one about the government, we should note that, in many cases, a nation's politicians are only a reflection of its people. Here, we can realistically blame Trump for spiking the political polarization we see. This polarization is the result of tribalism, a tribalism that is built on the practice of canonizing one's own views and leaders and stoking fear by demonizing one's opponents. And many of us just go along with that.

If this article seems pessimistic to you, then good. I really don't see anyway out of the mess that the whole nation, including its politicians and its people, have made for itself.




Tuesday, September 8, 2020

Where The Left Is Taking Wrong Turns

 It seems that there are some from the Left whose actions are counterproductive to their stated interests. That is sad. Where their actions are counterproductive are in the areas of their attacks on the Democrats and in their ambivalent stand on violence during protests.

Based on internet discussions and readings, there are self-proclaimed Leftists who strongly attack the Democrats in general and Joe Biden and Kamala Harris  in particular. Now it isn't that I am against criticizing any of the Democrats. Even the best of them, like Barack Obama, did little if anything to advance the Leftist interests. Rather, they seemed to be strong supporters of the global side of neoliberalism. In addition, Obama's administration did not pursue the prosecution of the Wall Street execs who played major roles in the 2008 economic collapse. Compare that with the Obama Administration's record of prosecuting more government whistle blowers than all previous administrations combined. In addition, Obama wanted to fast-track acceptance of the TPP. 

So we can see that the Obama-Biden record cannot be supported by Leftists without being under duress. The supplier of the duress is the Republican Party and their nominee for President.

But compared to Trump, Biden can be tolerated because the Democrats' goal of  corporate control of the government is traveling at a slower speed than the Trump train. In other words, we have much more time to change things under Obama than we do under Trump. The Obama-Biden ticket did not attack the USPS nor has it endangered safety net programs like Social Security and Medicare. In addition, the Obama-Biden team took efforts to protect the environment as well as the rights of the LGBT community. In addition, its justice department looked into racism in different police departments.

As some "Leftists" have said to me on the internet, Trump is preferable to Biden because Biden is a neoliberal. Well, Trump is too. Only Trump emphasizes the domestic end of neoliberalism while the Biden and the Democrats emphasize the global side of neoliberalism. In addition, Trump's personality traits and actions in office show that he is a wannabe dictator. He is taking actions to destroy the USPS in order to suppress voting. He is taking actions to destroy the financial base of Social Security and Medicare. And he has been constantly cutting the social responsibility ties of the corporate world by lowering their taxes and cutting environmental regulations.

Yes, Biden is horrible; but Trump is worse. So the "Leftist" effort to attack Biden and, in the words of some, because they prefer Trump is in no way helpful to Leftist interests.

There are 3 possibilities as for why self-proclaimed leftists would prefer Trump to beat Biden. The first possibility is that some of these leftists so hate the Democratic Party that they want it destroyed at all costs. And in doing so, they seem to be in denial of the costs the rest of the nation and our democracy will pay for their efforts.

The second possibility is that some of these leftists are really Russian trolls. Both the State Department and the Republican controlled Senate Intelligence Committee are on record about how Russia used multiple attempts to affect the outcome of the 2016 election. And that they are making similar attempts during this election.

The third possibility is that some of these leftists are really Republican provocateurs.

The second wrong turn that the Left is taking is to not take an adamant stand against violence during the protests. The Left's failure here touches on both practical concerns and moral concerns. The moral concerns is that violence and destruction of property is clearly  wrong. Having said that, we have to understand that for some of the protesters, the violence and destruction of property is understandable considering the legitimate rage that hundreds of years of marginalization has created. This is particular true for many Blacks and for the LGBT community--though the latter is not involved in violent protests. This strongly opposing violence and destruction while stating that some of it is understandable is the approach Martin Luther King Jr. took when race riots broke out across the U.S. On the one hand, he condemned the violence and destruction that was part of the riots. On the other hand, he said: 'a riot is the language of the unheard.'

On the practical side, those marginalized people who participate in riots must understand that violence and destruction of property make many privileged people even more resistant to changing the status quo than they are by nature. This is especially for those who are comfortable because change is the most demanding venture a person can take on. And considering that we have an authoritarian society, change for those who are privileged is even more difficult to accomplish when they feel unjustly threatened.

I like Black Lives Matter (BLM). I understand their agenda and thing it is find for society, though not for the Church. But I know from friends that once violence and destruction can be associated with them, the people that need to listen the most will paint BLM with a single color from a broad brush unless BLM strongly condemns the violence and destruction that have been associated with many protests.

If the Left wants to be more influential, we have a couple of u-turns to make. And the quicker we are at making those u-turns, the more time we have to influence people despite the fact that we have no true Leftists in our federal government.